![]() |
|
| Home | What We Do | Awards | Who We Are | In The News | Contact Us | Careers | Links | |
Tunnel Interceptior and Lift Station
Design |
The project involves the construction of a 200 feet below grade, 96 inch sewer, tunneled in rock Horner & Shifrin provided design and construction engineering services for the design of a major project for the Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer District. This project (part of MSD’s Lower Meramec River Wastewater System Improvements Program) involves the construction of a deep (approximately 200 feet below grade), large-diameter (96 inch) interceptor sewer, tunneled in rock. The interceptor sewer will deliver wastewater from a substantial portion of southwest St. Louis County to a very large lift station; that will then convey wastewater into a new wastewater treatment plant, located at the confluence of the Meramec and Mississippi Rivers. The 96-inch diameter interceptor, to be installed within a roughly 12-foot diameter hole tunneled in limestone will extend from the lift station approximately 20,300 feet upstream to allow MSD to eliminate the outdated, under-capacity Baumgartner treatment lagoon, as well as intercepting flows from the Mattese Creek and other watersheds along the way. Ultimately, the tunnel interceptor will be extended roughly another 25,000 feet further upstream, in order to allow MSD to eliminate the existing Fenton and Grand Glaize wastewater treatment plants.
The lift station design includes housing four centrifugal pumps to convey the expected peak wastewater flow to the nearby treatment plant and allows for the future installation of two additional pumps to bring to nearly double the lift station capacity. The lift station also includes a natural biofilter odor control system to treat odorous / corrosive air flows, in order to protect the workers that may have to enter these environments for maintenance purposes and to prevent offensive odors from escaping to nearby residential areas.
This cooperation between design team, construction manager, and owner was certainly a major part of the reason why the low bids received for these two construction contracts were within 1 % of the engineers’ estimate. |
© 2008 Horner & Shifrin, Inc. Terms
of Use
Privacy
Statement